Skip to main content

To Foster Creativity, Let's Rethink Our Model

Who's more creative?

Author Tom Wujec tells us in his TED talk, “Build a Tower, Build a Team”, The Marshmallow Challenge: a collaborative task where team members are asked to build the tallest structure possible out of a select group of materials. He reveals that out of all the various age groups tested, kindergarteners are typically the most successful, outperforming most post-grad students in both structure height and creativity. 

Younger children have a more unhindered thought process, one that isn’t limited by past experiences and fear of suggesting something too radical. As Toffler Associates describes*, when the kids are able to think for themselves at their own pace, “they are inclined to develop completely fresh solutions to a central problem”; they approach it as interdisciplinary, “not linear and results focused”. 


As I touched on in my last post, the “Four C’s” are the ideal 21st century blueprint for teaching our students and for hiring employees who add value. Companies are scouting for candidates who not only display strengths in these categories, but can think for themselves and utilize these skills to elevate their peers to create thorough solutions to problems. 


Creativity, just like playing basketball, is a skill. It needs to be practiced in order to be improved. The first step is to find an environment where the skill can be practiced. At Huddle Up, we created a purpose built platform where the goal of learning moves beyond comprehension - and into creating a solution with content. It’s why we say learning needs to move from “What do you know?” to “What you can do with what you know?” 


     


HuddleUp users bridge the connections between all of these newly created solutions. In this customized environment, HuddleUp defies the standard linear and results-focused process of learning by encouraging the users to learn from their peers’ creativity and strengthen their own perspective on the problem at hand. 


Then, we let each user leverage the power of interactive feedback to improve their solution. 


If we want learners who can create effective solutions, then we need a platform that focuses on that goal.   

 

With Huddle Up, we have a platform that goes far beyond the video-and-quiz model. Finding the "right" answer (comprehension) is only part of the journey. The primary goal asks learners use knowledge in order to create an effective solution - as evaluated by others - in an authentic, customized environment.


It’s a model that mirrors how we learn in the real world.  And, it’s one way we strive to meet our mission to transform online learning for individuals and organizations through a more purposeful, interactive environment.




Derek
CEO, Jetlag Learning, creators of Huddle Up Learning




* https://www.tofflerassociates.com/vanishing-point/why-kindergarteners-always-win-the-marshmallow-challenge

 

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Evolution of Online Learning: Four Stages and What's Next?

(This 2022 post was modified in July 2023.) The pandemic has made everyone far more knowledgeable about online learning platforms than they were 24 months ago. We each know (and feel) the strengths and the limitations of more than a few platforms.  We each have a long and growing list of features we want to see in the next evolution of online learning.  So, it seems a rather good time to step back and explore the evolution of online learning - to see how far we've come, and where we might be heading. One of the best resources out there is a simple progression chart shared in this intriguing article by Tiago Forte. The Future of Education is Community: The Rise of Cohort-Based Courses The evolution of online learning: What's next? We love big-picture reflections like this. While we are all aware of the current disconnect that still exists between the reality of our online learning platforms and the skills and knowledge we want to transfer to learners, we can all agree that the e

When did collaboration and learning become separated?

I like to talk to people about what systems, structures, and platforms they use to help their teams collaborate, learn, and problem-solve.  It doesn't really matter if I'm talking with trainers, consultants, or educators. I usually hear something like this: "We have our (training) courses inside of  ( INSERT NAME OF LMS HERE) . And, then we collaborate every week on  ( INSERT ZOOM, SLACK, GOOGLE MEET, ETC) " When did we start thinking / saying this?  Was this a prevalent phrase pre-pandemic? I don't remember hearing it then. (Perhaps I wasn't listening.) It's certainly a common paradigm now. More importantly, what impact does its arrival have on the way we structure our team's environments? For starters, it brings up a few odd questions. Aren't we naturally better learners when we collaborate? Aren't we better collaborators when we're learning along the way? Don't we do one better when we incorporate the other? When we think of the syst

AI & Organizational Learning - a different approach

Consider this post an invitation to engage for every AI expert seeking to transform the way teams and organizations learn. We consider ourselves AI enthusiasts, but not experts - and we are in need of advice and support from those higher up the ladder. These days, organizational learning is a pretty dynamic space. Everyone's abuzz with AI - and for good reason. Every day, it's linking content and context in fantastic new ways. The content has always been there.  It's the context piece that makes AI so exciting - and also its biggest challenge. How can we get AI to become ever more intelligent about "our" context? How can AI help generate solutions and feedback that are contextualized to what "we" need?   To transform learning with AI, most people are seeking to answer the following question: How can we leverage AI to capture all the relevant data in our learning ecosystem?   We're asking a different question. How can we reimagine the learning ecosys