Skip to main content

Follow Huddle Up and share your interactive experience.

We're Running Faster, But It's The Wrong Race

It's clear that the pandemic has changed our entire outlook on online learning. Certainly, online learning is an essential part of what we do - but recent experiences shed light on the problems that exist within it. Online learning, as it exists today, has had a rough time of it. 

(This article has minor edits since it was published in Ed Tech Digest.)



We found frustrated, isolated students. We found instructors working increased hours in order to maintain a sense of a classroom community and develop the higher-order skills that could be practiced far more often in our face-to-face environments. Throughout the pandemic, the missing pieces in our online learning were far more apparent. Our earlier infatuation soured; it became apparent we needed more. 

Initially, we embraced the efficiency of online education. It delivered learning to many. Yet, that efficiency is a two-edged sword. It simply helped us run the wrong race a whole lot faster. We took learning recall (having students demonstrate learning with quizzes, short answers, and summaries) and gave it a turbo-boost. That seemed like a great step forward until we lost our ability to meet face-to-face.

Our current online platforms are primarily structured to share resources and assess learning recall. Targeting anything deeper than that requires "adding on" - additional platforms, activities, teacher planning. As resources and time get stretched thin, it becomes increasingly difficult. 

The current learning platforms start from the foundation of content recall, yet we need to move far beyond that to target more meaningful skills. The pandemic highlighted this need, and it represents a clear opportunity for growth. We need to rethink the way we deliver learning in order to target the skills we want.

We know what good learning should look like. Technology doesn't have to drive that learning, but it certainly shouldn't hinder it. If we start from the shallow premise that learning happens when we upload resources so that students can demonstrate a superficial understanding of that content, then we're already two steps behind. Anything else can only come as an add-on.

Project-Based Learning (PBL) believers have advocated for years about what good learning looks like. They know that we need to let students take ownership of their learning. We need projects where it's impossible not to demonstrate skills like creativity, critical thinking, collaboration, communication. and citizenship.



Two of my favorite ed-tech disruptors share some excellent examples of what learning should look like. It should not be surprising that neither of them mentions technology at all. 

In his summary of Harvard professor Eric Mazur's work with physics students, Alan November paints a vivid picture of this active social learning and highlights the learning gains that are associated with it.

By making the learning a socially interactive experience, where students are discussing and debating the problems with each other, Dr. Mazur has found that his Harvard students are much more engaged in the class—and they also learn more from each other than they learned from him alone. In fact, he has seen achievement gains that are three times greater than what he experienced when he used to lecture. 
- Alan November, November Learning


An even more tangible description of this sort of active learning is provided by Jeff Utecht. He notes within rich learning tasks (such as PBL), the learning is not the final product. The real learning occurs during the process that learners go through.  He shares:


The learning happened in the doing. Doing research, connecting information sources, trying something out, trying again, learning, watching more videos, reading more websites, and doing. That’s where the learning occurred. 

           - Jeff Utecht, The Thinking Stick, September 19, 2019 

Are our current learning platforms set up to facilitate this kind of learning? Are they primarily designed for (instead of merely accommodating):

  • Fostering student creativity? 
  • Social learning: connecting learners?
  • Purposeful learning: Asking students to apply their knowledge by developing solutions to relevant problems?
  • Allowing learnings to give one another feedback in a variety of ways?
  • Creating a learning community where we learn from one another, not simply the instructor?

The unfortunate answer to these questions is "no."

If we start with these outcomes as our goals, then we have to start looking for ways to enhance or go beyond many of the current learning platforms we use.  That is a mindset decision that lies within us first and foremost, not a technology issue. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Moving Online Learning Forward

Online learning - and our collective thoughts about it -  has evolved dramatically in the last year. Creating and sharing engaging content online has been a difficulty experienced everywhere. The content hasn't changed, but our difficulty in engaging with it in an effective way online has certainly posed its fair share of challenges. "Good content is the first step. But the next step involves those conversations and interactions you have with others to illuminate the content and help you remember it.” - June Ahn, Ph.D In the article  Adapting to the (Not So) New Age of Computer Learning  Kayt Sukel shares some of these difficulties and how to engage learning in a virtual environment.  “Unfortunately, online instruction isn’t as simple as throwing a textbook online—and, in my opinion, online education platforms have focused too much on just putting content up online,” - June Ahn, Ph.D Likewise, feedback is integral to an effective learning environment. In another excellent blo

A New Model to Target the "4 Cs" of Learning

  The “Four Cs” are established goals for learning in today’s world.  Creativity Critical Thinking Collaboration  Communication Schools around the world strive to foster these traits in students. Companies seek out individuals who can excel at these skills to lead their teams.  Despite the often cited disconnect between the world of business and academia, the Four Cs represent one area where there is solid agreement.  Organizations such as the Partnership for 21st Century Skills and Common Sense Education rightly tout these as a gold standard for what learning can be. Unfortunately, given the recent massive shift to online learning, the current model of watching videos (or listening to lectures), followed up with a quiz provides ample evidence of where our current online learning models are falling short.  Online learning falls short The Huddle Up platform represents a very different type of online learning experience. A platform that specifically targets the Four Cs by providing a

Why Huddle Up?

The "Why Huddle Up?" question is closely tied to "Why did we build Huddle Up?". And, it's a great place to start. In short, we're tired of online learning models that consist of boring videos with an occasional quiz. That's outdated learning. It's not relevant or engaging.  And, it's doing a disservice to any individual who has had to endure it... and the companies and schools that expect (and need) so much more.  Unlike that model of learning, we created Huddle Up because we believe the best learning comes when 1. Learners are involved in trying to create and share solutions, not memorize facts 2. Learners actively give feedback to one another, to improve each user's solution. 3. Real learning is not demonstrated by what you know. It is demonstrated by what you can do with what you know - and how your application of knowledge is judged by others. As educators ourselves, we sought to create a very different kind of learning platform that was