Skip to main content

When did collaboration and learning become separated?

I like to talk to people about what systems, structures, and platforms they use to help their teams collaborate, learn, and problem-solve. 

It doesn't really matter if I'm talking with trainers, consultants, or educators. I usually hear something like this:

"We have our (training) courses inside of  (INSERT NAME OF LMS HERE). And, then we collaborate every week on  (INSERT ZOOM, SLACK, GOOGLE MEET, ETC)"

When did we start thinking / saying this? 

Was this a prevalent phrase pre-pandemic? I don't remember hearing it then. (Perhaps I wasn't listening.) It's certainly a common paradigm now. More importantly, what impact does its arrival have on the way we structure our team's environments?

For starters, it brings up a few odd questions.

  • Aren't we naturally better learners when we collaborate? Aren't we better collaborators when we're learning along the way?
  • Don't we do one better when we incorporate the other?
  • When we think of the systems we use, why do we naturally separate these two?

Collaboration and Learning: 1:02



The truth is, we have grown to think of these two activities as separated because the current learning model of our LMS is passive. We basically watch videos and take quizzes. Maybe we even engage in a few chats.  But our current platforms are not set up to help us learn from each other. That's why we turn readily and unapologetically to other platforms to help us collaborate.

It's so engrained in us that we probably don't recognize how odd this really is. It's just an accepted fact. 

However, in reality, don't our best collaborate experiences come when we share our ideas, solutions and feedback? We benefit from hearing the feedback of others. We benefit from seeing how others have solved that problem.  The best collaborative experiences are like dances where we each take turns leading.

SPOILER PREVIEW FOR A FUTURE POST: Reflect on the "collaboration" during your last Zoom meeting. Did it feel like a collaborative experience with different people "leading the dance"? Or, did it feel like a lecture with Q&A?

But our current LMS systems are simply not set up to do this. 



Better LMSs will not make Zoom meetings a thing of the past. We need synchronous time together (virtually or in person). But if our LMS platforms did a better job of helping us learn from each other's ideas asynchronously, we could spend less time in Zoom meetings (and have a much more collaborative dialogue when we did) because each member's ideas and feedback would already be visible to everyone.

That's an idea where I'd like to collaborate and learn more.
Anyone else want to collaborate about collaboration?


Additional resources to consider:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Evolution of Online Learning: Four Stages and What's Next?

The pandemic has made everyone far more knowledgeable about online learning platforms than they were 24 months ago. We each know (and feel) the strengths and the limitations of more than a few platforms.  We each have a long and growing list of features we want to see in the next evolution of online learning.  So, it seems a rather good time to step back and explore the evolution of online learning - to see how far we've come, and where we might be heading. One of the best resources out there is a simple progression chart shared in this intriguing article by Tiago Forte. The Future of Education is Community: The Rise of Cohort-Based Courses The evolution of online learning: What's next? We love big-picture reflections like this. While we are all aware of the current disconnect that still exists between the reality of our online learning platforms and the skills and knowledge we want to transfer to learners, we can all agree that the evolution above represents some significant a

Transforming The Way Cohorts Collaborate and Learn

Recently, our Huddle Up team has been having a debate about the cohorts we serve. One Platform: Resources. Ideas. Feedback. Data. Do we strive to transform the way online cohorts collaborate and learn? Or, to transform the way cohorts collaborate and learn?  In short, does the interaction and data shared within Huddle Up's platform allow cohorts to have more productive virtual and face-to-face meetings? We'd like to think "yes". But ultimately, time (and data!) will tell -  as Project Leaders continue to find innovate use-cases. In the last few weeks, we've created a few helpful videos to showcase the Huddle Up model. We hope they shed light on the big potential we see for how to help cohorts be more connected, engaged, and accountable to each other by focusing on ideas and feedback. If you're looking for more specific Huddle Up resources, check out our information for Project Leaders or for Participants/Learners . Interested in learning more about Huddle

3 Questions to Plan Engaging Interactive Experiences

 We recently received a great question from a Project Leader. (Thanks Mike.) How can I set up the most effective Huddle Up Project?   He had recently read an earlier post we shared entitled Engagement is the key... an how to get it . In essence, there was some disconnect between that post and the ideas were were discussing. The question was a great one because we were talking about related - but different - environments.  The earlier post referred to all online activities while our tips were specific to creating an engaging Huddle Up Challenge - the backbone of the Huddle Up Project. So, we decided to share a post to show the relationship between the lists.  Helpful Tips Below, we've shared some videos and examples to add more context.  Care for some examples? Lastly, it's always helpful to see a few examples of Challenges in the context of our three questions. To what degree will this challenge allow each learner to create a unique solution? Will learners benefit from seeing