Skip to main content

Creating Action-Based Learning Environments. (Moving Past Passive Learning)

Today's learners are ready to move past passive models. We know we need to structure engaging, active (action-based) environments. These environments are naturally collaborative, but doesn't necessarily make them examples of collaborative learning. Or, vice versa.

This is a key distinction for those that want to innovate the way their teams and organizations want to learn

Collaborative learning is defined by trying to enhance learning by working together. But these collaborative experiences don’t necessarily have to be active. For example, we could study for a exam, which is collaborative but will result in no truly active element. It’s aim is comprehension and understanding.

Action-based learning provides learners with an experience in a setting where they are required to go beyond simple comprehension and put what they are learning into practice. Action-based learning is contrasted by passive learning (where the goals is comprehension, superficial understanding, and ‘correct’ answers). As we all know, passive learning is, unfortunately, the default model in most of our learning environments.

In a technical sense, there is no direct connection between the two.

Yet it's easy to see how action-based learning is much more engaging and challenging. Action-based environments foster much more collaboration. If a learner has to take action, there’s much higher likelihood to seek out advice, ask questions, and want feedback on initial ideas. This is especially true when a team (or cohort) is collectively working on trying to solve the same problem. It provides an experience where each learner is intrinsically curious about how everyone on the team solved that problem and can learn from their solutions.

Compare that to passive learning. We don’t really ‘learn’ anything by observing how our peers answer a quiz question or summarize something they've read about. Passive learning models can’t take advantage of the opportunities for cooperation and social interaction because there aren't many natural opportunities to do so. It’s only when we specifically ask learners to contribute their creative solutions that we can leverage the power of social learning where we learn from each other.

When we do that, we open up new windows for opportunities to learn from each other, build a stronger team, and challenge ourselves to come up with the best solutions for a given contextual problem that we are all facing. In short, we make learning relevant, solution-focused, and naturally interactive.

If your team had this sort of opportunity, what impact would you likely see?

  • More engagement?
  • Fewer drop outs?
  • Greater collaboration and teamwork?
  • A transparent archive of the team's solutions and feedback?

We believe learners are begging for this type of transformation. We would love to engage with others who are interested in sharing solutions, questions, and barriers.


Popular posts from this blog

When did collaboration and learning become separated?

I like to talk to people about what systems, structures, and platforms they use to help their teams collaborate, learn, and problem-solve.  It doesn't really matter if I'm talking with trainers, consultants, or educators. I usually hear something like this: "We have our (training) courses inside of  ( INSERT NAME OF LMS HERE) . And, then we collaborate every week on  ( INSERT ZOOM, SLACK, GOOGLE MEET, ETC) " When did we start thinking / saying this?  Was this a prevalent phrase pre-pandemic? I don't remember hearing it then. (Perhaps I wasn't listening.) It's certainly a common paradigm now. More importantly, what impact does its arrival have on the way we structure our team's environments? For starters, it brings up a few odd questions. Aren't we naturally better learners when we collaborate? Aren't we better collaborators when we're learning along the way? Don't we do one better when we incorporate the other? When we think of the syst

Huddle Up: A Getting Started Guide for Project Leaders

Welcome to Huddle Up! This guide is to help Huddle Up Project Leaders get started. If you don't find the information you want below, e mail us or schedule a meeting with our team. If you wish to learn more general information about Huddle Up, click here . If you wish to join a project as a Huddle Up participant, click here . Your Interactive Platform We transform the way cohorts collaborate and learn by focusing on shared ideas and feedback  to build a more connected online community. CONTENTS OF THE GUIDE Registering on Huddle Up Creating a Project Inviting Users to Join Your Project Setting Up and Running Your Project General Overview Adding / Adjusting Content to your Project   Add a Ready Add a Run Add a Huddle Communicating and Interacting within Huddle Up REGISTERING ON HUDDLE UP If you have a Google account, register in just one click. Otherwise, create an account with any email and password combination. You will receive a confirmation email, pl

Form follows function: Platforms can transform the way we learn

  We welcome feedback, questions, and insights on the piece below. We learn best when we learn together. Everyone is familiar with "form follows function".  When architects design a building, they begin that process by understanding the function - the purpose - of the building. So,it begs the question: What are the outcomes (the functions) we want from the learners who take part in the learning experiences we structure? We all know the typical answers to this question. "We want learners who..." take action by applying knowledge collaborate with others, sharing ideas and feedback feel part of a team who can learn from each other are accountable to themselves and others for learning and sharing Yet, it's ironic that we structure isolated learning in platforms that are largely content repositories, storing videos and PDFs mixed in with an occasional quiz. It's time we re-think how we deliver learning. We need to re-think our concept that learning and collabora